![]() there’s never been a BETTER interface than “proxysel” EVER. Who would WANT to ****ing do this anymore!? No you Dip-****’s it won’t be ANYTHING NOW. But the high priests at Mozilla don’t give a **** they say it will be so much better and faster. being able to cycle every damn thing (JS, J, F, GL, RTC, SL, C, I, A, CS, P) on and off to GET THE JOB DONE. Whatever the band or labe use, the promotor will need to “go there” and so if it’s Facecrook or MySpace or YouTube or VeVo or Livestream or whatever the promotor needs to be there a tad bit faster than the curve. These extensions let the promoter “CUT THRU” lots of bull**** so that they can get videos uploaded, pages rendered, and a plethora of other stuff. Okay Music Promoter-gots a firefox, they use several add-on’s/extensions (Oh to cloud the ****ing names on this **** too for the ****ing masses! Describe your problem “exactly” or else get flamed young Green Horn.) NO you **** ****’s things won’t BE at ALL. But the **** story the devs give and their fanboys about how much better and faster things will be. OKay Radio Tech-got’s a firefox, got a Scrapbook, got whole Radio repair manuals and tweaks from 0-9 and A-Z in scrapbook and Firefox is USED FOR SCRAPBOOK. I know the devs don’t give a **** but it makes me want to punch em when I ever meet em. I will add a bit more fire to the death of XUL consequences. Try to voice such an opinion there, and I promise you they’ll downvote your write-up to hell. The Firefox subreddit is clearly hostile to those who want to preserve some basic functionality for their browser, while it favors the performance guys over anyone else, labeling that “progress”… However, they are completely forgetting that progress is also about creating new capabilities instead of killing them off. Nowhere have I read anyone supporting this, and here Mozilla should really think about what they do to their users who still (somewhat blindly in some cases) trust them. Although it should be noted that some negative voices have lately been heard because of privacy disasters like Cliqz being introduced by Mozilla. If it were not so, they wouldn’t have come up with the very limited framework that is WebExtensions. This is why I am telling you guys over and over again that Mozilla is only interested in the simple user crowd. If you care about speed above all else, greatness awaits! Yet IMHO speed is nothing without having some proper functionality in the browser, so there is that. If you heavily depend on add-ons (like I do) you won’t be very happy about the direction Firefox is heading in, not only because some add-ons won’t be ported, but also because very powerful add-ons won’t be possible with WebExtensions anyway, somewhat limiting the creativity of the authors. The mixed opinions on Firefox as of late came to pass because people naturally set different priorities. > Ghacks comments are mostly negative, though it depends on the period, and Reddit’s mostly positive. The beta release is mostly for beta and nightly users of Firefox. LastPass plans to release the WebExtension version next month to make sure that Firefox users that use a release version of the browser can keep on using the add-on and service associated with it. ![]() ![]() The binary component controls features such as attachments to secure notes, importing and exporting of data, additional encryption at the OS level, importing from Chrome, Opera and Safari password managers, autologoff functionality, login state sharing, copy password or username from vault, copy password from Password Generator, and fingerprint authentication. Any feature requiring the binary component won't work. The binary installer of LastPass cannot communicate with the WebExtension yet.You can check the version by clicking on the LastPass icon, and select More options > About LastPass from the menu. This means that it is necessary to reconfigure LastPass after installation. Firefox users who run LastPass 4.1.54 or earlier will have their local preferences reset during the update.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |